Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login


Submitted on
February 8, 2013
Image Size
7.0 KB


2,349 (3 today)
28 (who?)
Before You Call People Fascist... by BlameThe1st Before You Call People Fascist... by BlameThe1st
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
-Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride


Fascism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. [Merriam-Webster]


The term “fascist” gets tossed around a lot in our political discourse. Rarely is it used to describe someone who adheres to the political philosophy of fascism. Mostly it’s used as an epithet against those with an opposing political viewpoint. Democrats call Republicans “fascists” while Republicans call Democrats “fascists.” Barack Obama is called a “fascist.” Mitt Romney was called a “fascist.” George W. Bush was called a “fascist.” Even Ron Paul has been called a “fascist”!

The confusion surrounding this term arises from the fact that, unlike other political philosophies, fascism is not clearly-defined. Most other ideologies have manifestos that outline their political tenants. Communism has The Communist Manifesto. Nazism has Mein Kampf. Capitalism has The Wealth of Nations. But fascism has no such founding document. Because of this, its tenets have long been debated by historians and sociologists.

During the Bush administration, an article began circulating the internet called “The Fourteen Defining Characteristics of Fascism.” This article is attributed to political scientist Dr. Lawrence Britt who allegedly studied various fascist regimes and discovered 14 common characteristics among them.

Because of its vast distribution on the internet, the title of the article varies from “14 Points” to “14 Marks,” and the phrasing of the characteristics themselves also varies. But the 14 are usually listed as follows:
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism.
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights.
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause.
4. Supremacy of the Military.
5. Rampant Sexism.
6. Controlled Mass Media.
7. Obsession with National Security.
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined.
9. Corporate Power is Protected.
10. Labor Power is Suppressed.
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts.
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment.
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption.
14. Fraudulent Elections.
Although this article has been frequently shared and cited on the internet as a definition of fascism, it should not be considered a credible analysis of the ideology. The 14 characteristics are extremely vague and they easily apply to non-fascist countries. Indeed, if we take the first characteristic, “Powerful and Continuing Nationalism,” at face value, then every country is guilty of fascism, as people of all countries exhibit some level of national pride. Showing love for one’s country is not isolated to fascists.

Furthermore, the author who wrote the article does not exist. If Dr. Lawrence Britt were a credible authority on political science, he clearly would have published more than one article on the subject; yet a simple Google search of his name only retrieves variations of his one article and nothing else. No biography of him exists, not even a Wikipedia article!

This is because Dr. Lawrence Britt’s real name is “Laurence Britt,” and he is not a doctor, but a novelist. He only published one novel, June, 2004, and aside from that, his one and only article was published in the May 2004 edition of Free Inquiry Magazine.

As contributor Tom Head explains in his piece on the matter: “This op-ed was forwarded around from inbox to inbox, and readers eventually began putting a ‘Dr.’ in front of his name and referring to him as a political scientist who had compiled the fascism inventory independently of the Bush administration. He had not done so, and had never claimed to do so. The article was, and had always been intended to be, an argument against the Bush administration.”

However, while Britt is not a real political scientist, and his article is not a real credible source, a real historical analysis of fascism was compiled nearly 60 years prior to Britt’s piece.

In 1944, John T. Flynn published As We Go Marching. Unlike “Dr.” Britt, Flynn was a well-renowned journalist and political commentator who wrote for publications such as The New Republic, Harper's Magazine, and Collier's Weekly. (Also unlike Britt: he has a Wikipedia article! Flynn: 1, Britt: 0.)

In his book, Flynn analyzed the fascist regimes of Hitler and Mussolini and listed eight common characteristics between them. His “Eight Marks of Fascism” are as follows:
Point 1. The government is totalitarian because it acknowledges no restraint on its powers.
Point 2. Government is a de facto dictatorship based on the leadership principle.
Point 3. Government administers a capitalist system with an immense bureaucracy.
Point 4. Producers are organized into cartels in the way of syndicalism.
Point 5. Economic planning is based on the principle of autarky.
Point 6. Government sustains economic life through spending and borrowing.
Point 7. Militarism is a mainstay of government spending.
Point 8. Military spending has imperialist aims.
Aside from offering a comprehensive historical analysis on fascism, Flynn’s book also served as a critique of FDR’s New Deal policies, which Flynn feared were similar to the policies of the fascist regimes overseas.

His book is recommended for anyone curious about the history and ideology of fascism. An e-book version can be downloaded from the Mises Institute.

Those who don't have the time to read an entire book can read Lew Rockwell’s article “The Fascist Threat.” In it, Rockwell alludes to Flynn’s “Eight Marks” to provide a condensed analysis of fascism while also offering a scathing critique of the Bush and Obama administrations.

Both pieces are highly recommended to those who wish to understand fascism and what implications it has today.

Because if you insist on calling other people "fascist," it's best that you understand what the word and the ideology behind it means; otherwise, you might as well be calling them "doo-doo heads."
Add a Comment:
The-Conquerors Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
I have to disagree. AS a fascist there is no racism or religion and state intertwined. If you want to know more you can speak to me or just read this:… . By the way we fascist hate Ron Paul so whoever called him that is a moron. ~ C
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Nov 30, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Wow! Are you seriously a fascist.
The-Conquerors Featured By Owner Edited Nov 30, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Yes! Wanna know more? ~ C
Critic-007 Featured By Owner Sep 5, 2014
Religion was disposed by the Nazi's and Italian Fascists higher ups and while the latter tolerated it the former actively tried to stop it. 
PsychopathGod1984 Featured By Owner Aug 18, 2014
Your definition is just a pathetic as the Communist version of the Definition... Fascism as defined by fascist is simply this... A free market Socialist hybrid system in which the state allows capitalist ventures of all sorts as long as they can be proven to benefit society. The state simply decides what is what is beneficial based off of scientific evaluation. I see no problem with Fascist except for they were established at as time when racial pseudo-Science was popular..  When a Democracy fails it is time for fascism.. I believe anyone who really pays attention to history knows democracy had failed due to you Libertarians/Liberals in my ancestral home land before they elected Hitler to clean up the Fwee Mere-cat mess which the Libertarian made. Hitler took the Libertarians and they got the same fate as the Communist who wanted to destroy our Christian heritage. Germany remembers the reason they where forced to elect a radical anti-Semite and so Libertarians are what they call... Village... Idiots! 
Valkaneer Featured By Owner Mar 24, 2014  Professional Writer
"Historians, political scientists and other scholars have long debated the exact nature of fascism. Each form of fascism is distinct, leaving many definitions too wide or narrow."

So you waste a whole post on a certainty that never existed.


Carry on though, your thought process is so amusing.
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Mar 25, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
You're post is the one claiming certainty, basing your def of fascism on false pretenses.
Valkaneer Featured By Owner Mar 25, 2014  Professional Writer
My post is claiming a certainty that the GOP is certainly fascist, yes, yes it is. lol
Valkaneer Featured By Owner Mar 24, 2014  Professional Writer
I'm not a fascists because you don't know what one is! lol

Sounds so 'fascist' when you take that stance. ;P
CommanderEVE Featured By Owner Mar 5, 2014  Student General Artist
The Swastika is the wrong way around. 
Add a Comment: