Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×

:iconblamethe1st: More from BlameThe1st


More from deviantART



Details

Submitted on
February 25, 2013
Image Size
527 KB
Resolution
758×848
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
4,767 (4 today)
Favourites
87 (who?)
Comments
387
Downloads
17
×
Libertarians Vs Feminists by BlameThe1st Libertarians Vs Feminists by BlameThe1st
The man on the left is libertarian radio host Adam Kokesh, and the woman on the right is feminist blogger Rebbeca Watson.

One of the reasons I don't take modern feminism seriously is because feminists often concern themselves with non-issues. While libertarians like myself worry about American citizens being targeted for assassination, feminists are worried about female video game characters with big boobs and skimpy outfits. It's like worrying about the arrangement of the deck chairs on the Titanic. There are bigger problems threatening our country, and feminists instead focus on bogeymen such as "patriarchy," "rape culture," and "wage gaps."

There was a time when feminism was an essential social movement in American history, a time when women couldn't vote, own property, attend school, work outside the home, earn equal wages, dress as they please, or run for office; but now that women can do all of that and more, feminism as a movement seems obsolete. Sure, feminists still bitch about "gender inequality," but the "equality" they refer to is not so much "equal opportunity"--which they already have--but rather "equal outcome"--which they can never have because men and women are different and will therefore produce different results, even when given an even playing field. "Gender inequality" aside, the feminist movement remains irrelevant--at least in the West.

There are still countries where women lack equal rights to men. In Pakistan, a teenage girl was nearly assassinated for committing the "crime" of attending school. In India, a woman died after being brutally gang-raped in a bus, with one of her rapists having penetrated her with an iron rod, while her rapists were excused by the justice system. In the Congo, women are raped so frequently that rape is considered "cultural," while in Mexico, women have been the target of systematic violence, or "feminicide." In all of these countries, women suffer oppression and inequality under real patriarchy. It is these places where feminism is required most yet doesn't exist. Instead, feminism exists in countries like the United States where women already have the same rights as men.

Because of this, feminism has shifted from ensuring equal rights for the sexes to complaining about non-issues. Now it’s about demeaning stay-at-home mothers for not wishing to pursue a career outside the home; about preventing women from having consensual sex for money or posing nude in front of a camera (because women only have a right to their own body when it comes to killing their unborn children); about lying about how domestic violence increases during Super Bowl Sunday or how women are paid less than men due to sexism; about accusing a girl’s television show of promoting homophobia, racism, and anti-intellectualism; and about complaining when a man asks a woman out for coffee on an elevator. While women in the Middle East worry about being stoned to death for adultery, in America, feminists worry about a college girl being called a slut on the radio. Madness!

Meanwhile, feminists dismiss libertarians as "privileged white men." This is ironic, not only because feminists themselves are "privileged" and "white," but because unlike them, libertarians support the rights of all Americans, regardless of gender. We libertarians focus on the real issues currently facing our country: perpetual war, warrantless wiretaps, torture practices, drone strikes, indefinite detention, police brutality, drug prohibition, gun control, internet censorship, government spending, monetary inflation, corporate cronyism, just to name a few. These are issues that affect all Americans, be they man, woman, or child. These are the issues that libertarians concern themselves with--and yet they're considered "privileged" while feminists are "egalitarian"? Again, madness!

In conclusion, feminists would be taken more seriously if they actually supported true equality, which is the right of every man and woman to life, liberty, and property, and the freedom to utilize those rights provided they harm no one. Then again, if feminists truly believed that, they would be libertarians rather than feminists.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconlachassegalerie:
LaChasseGalerie Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2014
But muhh patriarchy.
Reply
:iconblamethe1st:
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
LOL!
Reply
:iconflutterboss:
FlutterBOSS Featured By Owner Jun 22, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Well, when you put it that way...
Reply
:iconomegaomni:
omegaomni Featured By Owner Jun 21, 2014
Objectification is a natural thing.  We objectify to understand how to use something. In turn we want to be objectified, because are true nature is laid bare for someone to appreciate.
When I go for a job interview I want the person to objectify me because anything else would be unfair. imagine the interviewer picking a less qualified person because he sees their "soul".

Radical feminist insist we do not objectify. Basically they want to force everyone to see some phoney essence in everything.  Max Stirner warned against this. Because in the end this essence is held over you. This essence is used against you.  "You're humanity is your master!"  Then we are tyrannized by this essence, the elite telling me what I am and how I should view people. You cannot do that or you harm your "humanity"!

Radical feminists want a utopia created by state compulsion. It's my right to objectivize anyone. I want to see scantily clad women. And women want to see a rich successful men.
To radical feminists sex is evil, and blocks us from seeing this phoney essence.  I honestly think women simply do not like sex and view anything to do with it as evil.  Women only enjoy sex if its tied to nesting IE sex is used to keep a mate.
Reply
:iconblamethe1st:
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Jun 22, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
LordTHawkeye made a good video debunking the concept of objectification: www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G9KBu…
Reply
:iconomegaomni:
omegaomni Featured By Owner Jun 21, 2014
Great post!  Too many radical feminists and white knights on deviant art. Glad to see a different voice.
Reply
:iconblamethe1st:
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Jun 22, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Welcome! ;)
Reply
:icontomboy6o3:
TomBoy6o3 Featured By Owner Jun 15, 2014  Hobbyist Photographer
Can't we all just accept men and women as simply human? We're humans, we have problems, and we blame others for our problems. Lets focus on both issues. 

....and no, I'm neither a feminist, nor an MRA.
Reply
:iconblamethe1st:
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Jun 15, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Amen. Same here.
Reply
:iconamandapeacelovesmile:
AmandaPeaceLoveSmile Featured By Owner May 29, 2014  Student Photographer
And that, is what we call a straw man argument.

That's when you make up priorities and arguments you claim your opponents would make instead of having an honest debate.

In other news, I hear feminists care about gender pay equity, political representation, military service, and stopping rape.  Libertarians focus more on debating the best styles for their tin foil hats and making anonymous blog posts. 
Reply
Add a Comment: