Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×

:iconblamethe1st: More from BlameThe1st


More from deviantART



Details

Submitted on
December 22, 2013
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
1,474 (3 today)
Favourites
15 (who?)
Comments
98
×
I’ve always considered religious extremists to be preferable to feminists. For example, while Catholics are dogmatically anti-sex, to the point where they consider “every sperm is sacred”, at least they permit missionary-style for the sake of procreation. Even radical Islamists, who force women to conceal themselves head-to-toe or else risk being stoned, will allow for procreative sex.

That’s more than I can say for feminists, who view sex as a tool of the “patriarchy” to subjugate women. Of course, they’re rarely consistent with this sentiment. They consider judging women for dressing provocatively as “slut shaming”, but then proceed to judge provocatively-dressed women in the media as contributing to “media objectification.” In other words, they have no problem with “slut shaming” when the “sluts” being “shamed” are busty scantily-clad video game characters.

But then you have the extremely radical feminists who insist that “all men are rapists” and deserve to be castrated. I wish that was merely hyperbole. I really wish it was. But sadly, there are blog posts like this that insist "all sex is rape":
If we look at the act in more detail (skip this parag if you can’t take it), PIV is a man mounting on a woman to thrust a large member of himself into her most intimate parts, often forcing her to be entirely naked, banging himself against her with the whole weight of his body and hips, shaking her like he would stuff a corpse, then using her insides as a receptacle for his penile dejection. How is this a normal civilised, respectful way to treat anyone? Sorry for the explicit picture, but this is what it is and it’s absolutely revolting and violating.

...The fact intercourse causes so many infections and tears and warts attests to the unnaturalness of intercourse, that it’s not meant to be. The vagina’s primary function isn’t to be penetrated by a penis but to eject a baby for birth. They are two muscle tissues / sphincters pressed against each other to help the baby be pushed out. Penetration of the penis into the vagina is completely unnecessary for conception
Sheesh! Even a sixth-grader with a basic concept of biology could see through the faulty reasoning here.

And yes, I know this is a "radical" feminist, and thus not representative of all feminists, but in all honesty, how is this not the logical conclusion of modern feminism? When you hear feminists shriek about how America is a "rape culture", and how "all men are potential rapists", and how advising women to take precautions in preventing rape is "rape apologism", and how women are never responsible for rape and never lie about being raped, how can the logical conclusion of that twisted thinking not be "all sex is rape"?
Add a Comment:
 
:iconerraticbasarafan:
ErraticBASARAfan Featured By Owner Jun 3, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
She practically admits to following radical Feminism with her very title "radical wind".
Reply
:iconblamethe1st:
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Jun 3, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
What a suprise!
Reply
:iconerraticbasarafan:
ErraticBASARAfan Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Not really; the vast majority of us picks a username relating to ourselves in some way.
Reply
:iconsilentrisingsun:
SilentRisingSun Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
"The fact intercourse causes so many infections and tears and warts attests to the unnaturalness of intercourse, that it’s not meant to be. The vagina’s primary function isn’t to be penetrated by a penis but to eject a baby for birth."

Do they not realize that childbirth also causes damage to the vagina, as well as the surrounding area?
Reply
:iconerraticbasarafan:
ErraticBASARAfan Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Ah, but check this out sogc.org/publications/breech-c…
Reply
:iconblamethe1st:
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Mar 25, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
That's probably part of their rationale to oppose it.
Reply
:iconcatlord44:
Catlord44 Featured By Owner Jan 8, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
"The vagina’s primary function isn’t to be penetrated by a penis but to eject a baby for birth. They are two muscle tissues / sphincters pressed against each other to help the baby be pushed out. Penetration of the penis into the vagina is completely unnecessary for conception"

Man radfems don't make sense.
Reply
:iconerraticbasarafan:
ErraticBASARAfan Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
What man WOULD want to be a radfem? That's a death wish!
Reply
:iconblamethe1st:
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Jan 8, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Feminists in general don't make sense.
Reply
:iconcatlord44:
Catlord44 Featured By Owner Jan 13, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Agreed.
Reply
Add a Comment: